Emma’s Story

When news emerged of those two unfortunate children in Athlone and what they may  have been subjected to,  most probably assumed that at least they would be well looked after now. The past week has suggested that is something that cannot be taken for granted. Emma’s story illustrates just how wrong things can go for the abuse victim.

The Ombudsman chose to publish Maggie’s report because she believed that Maggie’s case highlighted bigger problems with the HSE’s treatment of child sex abuse victims. Within hours of it being broadcast a woman who had first been in touch with me a few years ago renewed contact. She told me Emma’s story (all names changed).

Emma is eleven now, her parents are estranged and she would frequently return to her mum from overnight visits to her father with unexplained rashes, and disturbed/withdrawn behaviour.

Emma made a disclosure of abuse to her mother, she made the same disclosure to her GP, her teacher and the gardaí. This little girl never once changed her story.

As you know the DPP seldom pursues  prosecutions in this area largely because the evidence and testimony of young children is viewed as unreliable. But in Emma’s case the DPP decided to prosecute.

Just as in Maggie’s case, for whatever reason some officials in the HSE decided that Emma’s mother was a bigger problem than this apparent open and shut case of child abuse.  They recommended against Garda advice that the father be allowed to resume access visits. They did not provide the child with any therapeutic or counselling services. And they recommended that the mother be required to undertake psychiatric assessment to determine her fitness to parent.

She subjected herself to the humiliation of psychiatric assesment, and he gave her a clean bill of health. I have read that report … and I should say that everything I am reporting here is backed up with documentary evidence. What those documents, obtained under Freedom of Information, appear to point to is this.

The HSE interviewed mother and father separately but the father got in there first. He made a number of allegations about the mother. He said she was emotionally unstable, mentally ill and in the habit of making unsubstantiated allegations. Those suggestions were what was acted on. The mother was sent to see a shrink and the father was given resumed access to Emma.

Medical evidence would suggest the  abuse started again but the mother’s hands were tied in how she could respond as a result of a number of very hard to understand  things done by the HSE officials.

A recommendation was made in  Emma’s file that no action should be taken on any further disclosures of abuse for a period of year. Emma’s mother was told that if she made any allegations to anybody about her husband abusing their daughter she could end up before the courts.

In addition to which, the original allegations of her mental instability and the recommendation she be assessed by a psychiatrist were left on the file but the clean bill of health from the psychiatrist wasn’t attached … in fact they refused to attach it according to Emma’s mother.

There is a very significant amount of medical and forensic evidence to support the mother’s claim that her daughter was abused again after the dad’s visistation rights had been restored. She was examined by specialists in a children’s hospital and a number of alarming things were noted.  But the HSE never took action on a case that you would imagine should have had alarm bells ringing all over the place. The file which I have obtained a copy of says that  no action should be taken on foot of further disclosures without the mother first attending a psychiatrist  for ongoing treatment.

Emma’s mum was forced to go through the agony of sending her children, she says against their will, to stay overnight with their father … from where she would get text messages that would break the heart of any parent. This is a transcript of my interview with her.

SO the girls had a phone when the first went to stay with him. And they’d text me “I’m crying. I don’t weant to be here”.

They just didn’t want to go down to him and I had to force them to go down because I was told if I didn’t send them I’d be arrested. And that would be exactly what he would want, me being arrested and being found not to be a fit mother.

PBH:

Was Emma abused again?

Mother:

 Yes she was. On two occasions that I know of…. that I have seen the physical manifestations of the abuse again, yes. One of them she had to have a rape examination in the children’s Hopsital. She had an anal infection, and they found pubic hair.

PBH:

So there was a wealth of forensic and medical evidence supporting claims of abuse for the hospital to pass on to the HSE? Did they act on it?

Mother:

No they didn’t. They had a meeting and they decided that they weren’t going to act on it because it had come from me.

PBH:

It was medical evidence of abuse.

Mother:

My opinion on it is that they have made a grave grave mistake, and I’ve told them so. I said that I would hold them responsible, and I will until I get an apology for Emma.

PBH:

In your opinion did they directly expose Emma to the risk of being raped?

Mother:

Yes … Yes … I am absolutely sure that they did. They had a wealth of people that they could contact. They never did. They spoke to the wrong teacher in her school. I alerted them to that. They still didn’t care. I wrote into them all the times they were making a mistake.

But every time I did the risk was that I would have them taken off me, and I was afraid. I had to way up the fact that if I did they’d be given to him …. or I could just keep my mouth shut … and I’ve had to do that. …. It’s absolutely eating me.

 

 

The first criminal case never made it to court. But Gardai have received the second medical file which the HSE did not act upon and they are investigating.

The HSE dismissed Emma’s complaints of pain and soreness arising from the resumed abuse as being because she was suffering from a Urinary Tract Infection. This was an perhaps odd conclusion as the hospital lab results show that she didn’t have a UTI.

Emma has to see her father though his contact is supervised and limited. She has still not received any counselling whatsoever from the HSE.

There is a bigger point to be drawn from Emma’s story.

Each year over 3000 children make disclosures of sexual abuse. Large numbers of those children never access therapeutic  services. Now …. are they not going because they don’t need to. Or are they not going because they get therapy privately … or because like Emma and Maggie and others that I am being contacted by because the HSE is not providing treatment.

It is an illustration of a general point the Children’s Ombudsman made last week. Where a parent is articulate and forceful in standing up for their child officials will quite frequently label them as difficult and decide they are the problem.

Judge for yourself what happened here –  child is returned by the HSE to a father who appears to have continued abusing, HSE ignores the medical evidence of that abuse … but the mother is the crazy one in the HSE’s view even though she has a clean bill of health from a consultant psychiatrist.

That is a trauma for the parent … but what about the untreated child?

 

As with Maggie’s Story – the HSE doesn’t have any response. I contacted them four days ago seeking comment and I haven’t received an acknowledgment of that email. You can hear a podcast of my Drivetime report here, but if you’ve got this far you’ve read it all.

8 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

8 responses to “Emma’s Story

  1. Patrick Collins

    Well done again Phillip. Same M.O. as “Maggie’s” case. These are not the only two cases. Hopefully you will keep publishing these stories for as long as these victims of an egotistical system keep coming forward. It is terrible that these victims must be the front line soldiers in a battle to make such an ineffective, overbearing and hellish system more accountable and transparent. Until individual “named” case managers, social workers etc are made to explain their actions in a localised public environment the egotistical abusive behaviour of these nameless and shameful people will continue.
    Well done again. I do not look forward to your future reports but will continue to tune in and pass on your reports to friends, colleagues and acquaintances.
    Patrick Collins

  2. This should be on the front page of every newspaper in the country it is upsetting,disturbing and points to extreme desertion of duty by the HSE. This father betrayed his daughter in the most evil way and should never be allowed within a thousand miles of any child again let alone his own daughter. Your reporting as ever Mr Boucher-Hayes is of the highest standard however I fear it will disappear into media archives somewhere after a short period of finger pointing and buck passing because it doesn’t have the added selling point of a cleric performing the abuse.

  3. Padraig

    Your report on drive time yesterday greatly upset me. I wrote to my TD this morning regarding this case. I hope that by bringing this case to public attention some help and protection may be finally given to this poor girl.

  4. Emma

    “They just didn’t want to go down to him and I had to force them to go down because I was told if I didn’t send them I’d be arrested. And that would be exactly what he would want, me being arrested and being found not to be a fit mother.”
    Maybe she thought the girls would be in a worse position had she been arrested but I still don’t understand how a mother could physically make her daughters go somewhere she KNOWS they were being abused. It must have been heart breaking.

  5. Hi Philip,
    This story is shocking in it’s similarities with a story that had an outcome that is the polar opposite. Please contact Equality For Fathers In Ireland at equalityforfathers@yahoo.co.uk if interested. http://equalityforfathersinireland.webs.com/apps/blog/show/15656031-equality-for-all-unless-you-re-a-dad

    The Barr Judgement http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/1997/26.html states that:
    1) The health board’s records in each case should include factors favourable to the alleged abuser.
    2) The board’s assessment of the weight it attaches to each such allegation should be stated and should be objectively based.
    3) The complaint should be put to the alleged abuser in course of the investigation and he/she should be given an opportunity of responding to it.

    yet these basic principles are routinely ignored. It seems that HSE Child Protection Services simply believe the first account they receive, whether that is the father or the mother, and then shoe-horn their findings into the initial decision they make based on a one-sided report.

  6. Pingback: No country for small children | 140 characters is usually enough

  7. I feel physically ill at the thought of what that poor child and her mother had to endure. There is something intrinsically wrong with a society that fails to protect the vulnerable among us. How could that amount of physical evidence be ignored….. Heads need to roll for this and other screw-ups in the HSE. It’s the only way changes can be made – but it has yet to happen. How can these people live with themselves ?? Somebody, ultimately, has to be accountable.

  8. The failures of the HSE to do their job in accordance with their own protocols and procedures recently resulted in the following:

    303. Thus, there will be judgment for the applicant for the sum of €736,984.

    http://www.courts.ie/__80256F2B00356A6B.nsf/0/64CD014DA32F54A380257B050033CEC1?Open

    Can our country afford to fund such malfeasance in public office?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s